A Clash in both intellectual approach and psycho-moral approach will be expected to happen between Surecracy and Democracy, associated with another cohesion and/or clash in ideology and culture; It seems to appear as a must and a necessity; it can not be easily evaded especially if we - as Surecrats - are persistently claiming for the needed conceptual changes in the present system(s) of thoughts, disciplines, social justice arena, economic non-interest rate banking and financial systems, educational and health care changes, governing and its modeling that will be undergoing serious needed changes side by side with the needed socio-political and/or ideological changes ..; a matter which can heat the debate(s) and/or the discussion(s) taking it into real cohesion(s) and clash(es) between two or more competing human ideologies especially in the presence of Surecracy and its claims for realistic developmental changes ..
Again, It became a must and a necessity to stand against Democrats' coercion with their different ideologies .. where the believers in democracy and its manipulating conspiracy in Western Democracy are expected to try harder by using their police, military and/or intelligence to infiltrate and to oppress - at any time- Surecrats or to depress our natural development, to violate the Surecrats' legal rights to think and to believe uniquely and differently as well as to legally exist in opposition to democracy .. If this serious matter happens to Surecrats; and to their leaderships locally and/or internationally; Then the debate(s) will be transforming itself from discussions into real cohesions, coercions and/or clash(es) indicating the must and the necessity - for Surecrats - to defend themselves especially if Democrats showed no tolerance, aggression or rejection to Surecrats in the active life and/or existence ..
Surecrats are generally peaceful - by nature of this new ideology - they are mostly moderate to deal with non-surecrats except in situations of self-defense and of facing violence of others against us ; where Surecrats can turn suddenly into one of the worst type of ideological fighters in history of mankind especially if they face - at any time - democratic violence and destructive war(s) where human history of ancient and modern democratic civilizations eventually recorded it even among democrats themselves since the time of old Athens and Rome, passing by the modern history of the so called great British/French empires upto the modern history of Democratic Fascism, Democratic Communism-Socialism and Democratic Capitalism . If presently we are trying our best to open an intellectual, a psycho-moral dialogue with Democracy and democratic capitalism to teach them about our new perceptions and our justified arguments in our theological, socio-political, social-justice aspects, economical, environmental etc. approaches, we may face -especially at the beginning - the resistance and the Democrat's coercion against our demands and our claimed serious changes !
The Ideological and Political Aspects Of Two different opposing philosophies and/or disciplines can result into a notable cohesion/clash which can reflect the must and the necessity to face and to put boundaries between two very different identities; a reason why we advise Democrats - especially at the beginning of our message and during our surecratic development - to be more careful, more tolerant, less cohesive and definitely less violent to keep this expected cohesion/clash intellectually in the area of debates and knowledge discussions where the strongly intellectual, the justly rel event psycho-morally will compete to win in order to induce these needed changes which is dramatically searching for better development of peace and mutual benefits collaboration between Surecrats and Democrats based upon the equivalent justified self-interests on both sides of Surecracy Versus Democracy ..
If the clash of Surecracy versus Democracy happens, turning itself into a realistic must and an inevitable necessity; it may still be directed to keep our identity and integrity different, progressive, civilized and developmental via such a needed dialogue with Democrats with minimum cohesion between these two opposing ideologies Democracy versus Surecracy or Surecracy versus Democracy and Democratic Capitalism .. We hope - our best - for all mankind development that such a human clash; being considered as a must and a necessity between these two opposing philosophies and its related human ideologies do not take itself into form(s) of physical violence and/or destructive war(s) between Surecrats and Democrats to preserve the world's peace and the needed human civilized development ..
Autor: Sherif Abdel-Kerim, Founder Of Surecracy In Africa and North America; Calgary, Alberta , Canada ; Copyright (C) 2008.
No comments:
Post a Comment